OUR NETWORK:TiVoCommunity TechLore MyOpenRouter Dijit Community MediaSmart Home See all... About UsAdvertiseContact Us

 
Learn about scoring Forum's Raw Score: 191591.0
September 2, 2009 08:51 PM

Categories: Pogoplug Classic

Rating (0 votes)
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Rate This!

Member Avatar

pnam

Member
Joined: 08/15/2009

anyone have an idea what fs format performs the best with pogoplug? possibly ext2 since pogoplug runs linux? if so can we tweak performance with settings like noatime?

Discussion:    Add a Comment | Comments 1-3 of 3 | Latest Comment

September 3, 2009 12:44 AM

I haven't noticed any big differences. The HD attached to my PogoPlug has three partitions, one each formatted as ext3, NTFS, and HFS+ (unjournaled). Going over my LAN, it doesn't seem to matter which I use. I wrote about this here:

http://www.pogoplugged.com/forum/thread/11705/Filesystems/

September 4, 2009 9:34 AM updated: September 4, 2009 9:35 AM

I been running Fat32, NTFS and Ext3 drives on my Pogoplug for over 6 months now and can say that the best performing format without question is my Ext3 drive followed by NTFS then Fat32, with the caveat that they are also performing according to their size / age.  Each drive is a 7200 rpm, with size appropriate caches, so I'm not sure what if any of these points factor into their performance, but thought I'd post my results.


1 TB = Ext3

300GB = NTFS

150 GB = Fat32

September 4, 2009 5:59 PM

+1 for ext3. It's too bad the Pogoplug doesn't support ext4 (yet?), but ext3 is the default Linux filesystem, and the 'plug runs Linux.

Discussion:    Add a Comment | Comments 1-3 of 3 | Latest Comment

Add Your Reply

(will not be displayed)

Email me when comments are added to this thread

 
 

Please log in or register to participate in this community!

Log In

Remember

Not a member? Sign up!

Did you forget your password?

You can also log in using OpenID.

close this window
close this window